Thursday, 28 April 2016

If we can't accept limitations, we're no better than the bad guys

Captain America: Civil War (2016)


8.6/10 on IMDb
98% on Rotten Tomatoes

Chloe's thoughts: Signed, sealed and recommended by Chloe; Watch it in cinemas; I'm buying the DVD
(Edit: I wanted to put this as a Must-See, but check the very end of this review to see why I didn't)
Watch it if you: Like any Marvel film; Want to have a reason to go to the cinemas instead of watching something at home; Just want to have a GREAT time (who doesn't?!)

First things first, please redirect yourself over to Captain America: The Winter Soldier (2014) and Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015) if you have not done so already. Remember that while Phase One mainly consisted of individual films that could be separated, Phase Two of the MCU (starting from Iron Man 3 and including Guardians of the Galaxy (2014) and Ant Man (2015)) is starting to try and tie things together a bit more. Ant Man is a good watch, although I guess it's not super critical for you to see it to understand this film.

The main reason I say this is because a lot of the plot follows on from these two films, and if you haven't seen them, you will question a lot of the characters' actions, because it wouldn't seem realistic or understandable.

So, following on from Age of Ultron, the government (not just of America, but of the world) wants to keep the Avengers in check. What good is a team of superheroes if we can't regulate and monitor them? What good is a team of superheroes if their actions kill innocent lives, yet no one becomes responsible for those lives? Enter the Accords, which enables various governments to utilise the Avengers if, and only if, they deem them suitable. This places a huge restriction on the Avengers, essentially waving away their right to make any choices or decisions on their own, and so naturally a divide occurs. The Avengers team ends up splitting into two camps: the Team Iron Man pro-regulation camp, and the Team Captain America anti-regulation camp.

That's as far as I will go in terms of plot, for fear of spoilers. The film covers a lot of ground, and there are several plot elements that keep pushing the movie onwards and upwards, making it hard to talk about certain elements of the film without giving anything away. Because of the complexity of this film, the vast amount of characters, and the perpetual engine of a plot they have, this film is a long one, with a run time of nearly 2.5 hours. The good thing though is that it doesn't feel that long; we are always engaged, and when the director feels like the audience is getting a bit tired of something, something new pops up.

This was most obvious to me when Black Panther was introduced, because it gave me quite a jolt and it made that action sequence a lot more interesting. I was so glad I didn't research him up beforehand because that would have taken away from that shock factor when he came on-screen. I was seeing his abilities, motives, and personality come out while I was watching it, because I had absolutely zero idea who or what he was, and that was fantastic.

The same cannot be said, however, for another cameo character in the film. I have already expressed my annoyance of Marvel spoiling this cameo in their trailer, but in case some lucky person out there has been able to avoid all mentions of this cameo, I will still put a spoiler tag here.

!SPOILER! Click to reveal my thoughts regarding the cameo character in the trailer


As for the rest of the characters, we have already had a chance to meet them and so the film doesn't become overcrowded because not too much time is spent dwelling on their backgrounds or underlying motives. I actually was very convinced at the choices and motivations that these characters had, and I think the film did a great job at portraying the conflict that they naturally would have under such extreme circumstances. It was easy enough for me to speculate, "Why would this person be on this side? That seems uncharacteristic...", however the film did a great job at showing you why it was uncharacteristic and how that would affect some of the decisions they made, or even the way they fought. I think that was really interesting because in doing that, it made the film have some deeper themes about morality, the greater good, and one's liberty to act on their good intentions.

Another thing to note is that because of all the characters, it almost looks like another Avengers movie (everyone from the Avengers is here except Thor and Hulk), however I understand why it wasn't classified under the "Avengers" label. The film's plot is actually much more complex. It's not as simple as "the whole world is in danger" anymore; the plot here is on a smaller scale and the film seems more like an action-packed spy film.

As I said, it's hard to go in further depth because of the nature of the film, but I will also add that (apart from the cameo), the trailers actually did quite a good job. They didn't really tell you how the movie was going to unfold (like with Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice), but they told you the basic premise of it, and that was enough. In fact, a lot of the action scenes they use are actually from the opening sequence. This actually got me worried at first, because I thought "Oh no, don't tell me these were the best scenes they shot for the whole film!", but I then realised it was hard for them to select scenes from the rest of the film without spoiling it. So, well done.

There are a few downsides to this movie though. Firstly, I'm still slightly confused at how Scarlet Witch's powers are defined in this universe, as I think her powers could have been utilised better in this film. Of course, this can be explained away by the fact that she is still quite young and inexperienced in fighting, and she is not in the best emotional state at this point of the series.

Another issue is that I'm not completely convinced by the main villain's... prowess (for want of a better word). It was fantastic seeing all the elements of the film come together, but the film just did not spend enough time on him to explain to me why he would logically be able to do all those things. In fact, he actually doesn't really appear as a villain anyway, because his 'evilness' doesn't really come through (I didn't think there was any villain in this film until I read on IMDb that he could be considered a villain, but then I had to Google his character name because I was confused who it was talking about).

Lastly, this one's a bit of a spoiler, so only click if you have seen the film or just don't care!

!SPOILER! Click to reveal my thoughts on the general ending of the film


Overall, this is a great film and you will not be sorry for watching it in theatres. I actually wanted to say this was a must-see, because I think it deserves that special label, however there is internal conflict occurring because it doesn't really work as a stand-alone film, and if I put it as a Must-See, that implies that The Winter Soldier and Age of Ultron are also must-sees, since this film is quite dependent on them. So, if you have seen those, then it is a must-see for you.

A few side notes:
  • Ant Man's reaction to seeing Captain America is what all of our reactions to Chris Evans would be
  • Stay until the very end of the credits
  • If there's one reason to watch this film: Captain America's helicopter scene
  • Monday, 25 April 2016

    You want change without sacrifice; you want peace without struggle. The world doesn't work that way.

    The Divergent Series: Allegiant (2016)


    6.0/10 on IMDb
    12% on Rotten Tomatoes

    Chloe's thoughts: Low-energy entertainment
    Watch it if you: Like the Divergent series; Have seen the previous films and are curious about this one

    Ahh, at last we've come to the third and final installment of the Divergent series. Yup, that's right, they split this film into two parts just like all the other franchise series out there! Which was really confusing since the title says nothing about it being part one of the third novel?!

    I did a quick Google search of it, and the movie has been referred to as "The Divergent Series: Allegiant", "Allegiant", and "Allegiant: Part 1". Please make up your mind! Luckily I did this search before I watched the movie, so I knew that there was a high possibility the movie wouldn't actually end the series, but that was still disappointing.

    Anyway, rant over, let's move on to the movie.

    I will just straight up put it out there: this movie is pretty bad.

    This didn't surprise me, though, since the novels weren't amazing and the first movie was pretty bad. The second movie was, and still remains, the best in my opinion, but mainly because they changed a lot of the novel's elements and tried to incorporate more chances for action scenes and crazy visuals effects.

    They tried to do the same in this film, but unfortunately it just didn't work.

    It's not that the action scenes were not welcomed. In fact, they were probably the best part of the film. But the film (including the action scenes) tried to be smart, groundbreaking, and really epic, but everything just ended up being... subpar.

    For example, the visual effects obviously tells the audience that they are trying to be really cool and a really futuristic sort of film, but it ends up just being tacky because the quality is not there, especially seeing as this is a franchise film with a good budget. I suppose the effects of this are compounded because I watched The Jungle Book recently, which has done nothing but raised the bar for visual effects.

    Another instance of them trying too hard is the cringe-worthy dialogue. It's almost as if they got their target audience wrong and wrote the script keeping in mind easily-pleased five-year-olds.

    Aside from that, the acting was decent, but I think the actors lacked proper direction, and so you are left to feel like there's something that's still lacking.

    As to the plot, a lot of it seems to be all over the place. There are definitely notable themes about this film, particularly about genetic superiority, discrimination and segregation, however these don't really come to the foreground among all the general noise that's happening in the film. They added quite a few things to the novel's plot so that they could make up the time to fill a movie, and this was pretty obvious. There were quite a number of scenes that just seemed unnecessary. However, this does lead to the one plus about this film: there is always something happening. Even if this results in overcrowding the film, at least your mind is always focused on something, good or bad. The film kind of did the opposite of The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1. Instead of looking at everything from the book in detail, this film actually changed the source material substantially, adding in all sorts of filler elements. However, this did end up watering down the character development and making relationships between characters less convincing.

    In the end, there's not much going for this film except some B-level action sequences and explosions. It's enjoyable if you want to watch it just for mindless entertainment (and, let's face it, no one went in to this movie thinking it would be amazing), but it's not something that you will want to talk about the day after.

    Friday, 15 April 2016

    Forget About Your Worries and Your Strife

    The Jungle Book (2016)


    8.2/10 on IMDB
    94% on Rotten Tomatoes

    Chloe's thoughts: Signed, sealed and recommended by Chloe; Watch it in cinemas; I'm buying the DVD
    Watch it if you: Love Disney; liked The Jungle Book; like animals; want to see stunning visual effects


    The Jungle Book tells the story of Mowgli, a boy who, as an infant, was found alone in the jungle by a black panther named Bagheera. The boy is raised by the leader of a pack of wolves, and he grows up struggling to learn the 'way of the wolf' due to his human form. Further complications arrive when Shere Khan, a vengeful and violent Bengal tiger with a vendetta against mankind, discovers of Mowgli's existence and seeks to kill him.

    First things first, I'm not a very big fan of the original Disney film in 1967. Like many of Disney's older films, it's more of a conglomerate amalgamation of small and distinct events that the creators decided to shove together using Mowgli as a very loose plot device to connect them all. Perhaps the only redemptions of the 1967 film are the songs that are sung.

    But all that doesn't matter because this film isn't an adaptation of the original Disney film, it's an adaptation of the original novel by Rudyard Kipling, which apparently (I haven't read it yet) has more of a plot than the Disney film made it seem. But regardless of whether or not the current film is a faithful adaptation to the original novel, or whether the creators just added a few more plot elements, I was actually really pleased with the plot of this film.

    The whole story is tied together really well. I went into this film thinking it would lack substance and be boring like the 1967 one (but not as boring), but it definitely had more of a cohesive flow in terms of plot.

    Serious credit goes to Jon Favreau; he seriously did a great job with this film (if you don't know who he is, he directed Iron Man (2008) and Iron Man 2 (2010) and acted in the Iron Man films as Happy Hogan, Iron Man's personal assistant).

    The best thing about this film is the amazing CGI. If you are thinking of watching this, it is definitely worth a watch in cinemas. It's so amazing how everything looks so realistic. And I'm not just talking about the animals; they filmed this on a sound stage, meaning the entire Jungle is CGI! I didn't even realise that until after I watched the film and read up on it!

    Neel Sethi, the child actor who plays Mowgli, is amazing. He is really great, I can't believe he managed to pull this off. It must have been extremely difficult for him to imagine the animals and the jungle environment, but he really did a great job for having the only human role in this film. I'm definitely looking forward to his career, and I hope he goes far.

    The other actors are, of course, great as well. Ben Kingsley as Bagheera and Idris Elba as Sheere Khan were fantastic (although that might just be my love for British accents speaking).

    Bill Murray as Baloo was hilarious (and sometimes it felt like you really could see Bill Murray reacting under the bear's face - another credit going to the CGI department)! They also did some throwbacks to the original Disney film, keeping some of the songs, so it was great hearing BIll Murray sing The Bare Necessities; that was such a lovely scene.

    Christopher Walken as King Louie was alright... I know Christopher Walken is a great actor but I've just never liked his voice... he has the SAME VOICE for absolutely EVERYTHING! I didn't feel like his voice even worked in this character because the sequence with King Louie is actually quite sinister and ominous, and to me his voice is really cartoonist, so I felt like I wasn't as scared or worried as I should be. Having said that, he was great when singing I Wan'na Be Like You, although the song didn't seem to match the serious tone of that scene.

    Lastly, Scarlett Johansson and Lupita Nyong'o as Kaa and Raksha respectively were great female voice actors. Scarlett Johansson had a really minor part but who really cares when her voice is that sexy?! She also sings Trust in Me and while this isn't in the actual film, it's in the end credits and it's great. I was also blown away by how emotional Lupita Nyong'o's voice acting was. She was able to convey, just through her vocal cords, a strong yet vulnerable mother wolf, and it was amazing to hear, even just things like little trembles or quivers in her voice when her character was in a vulnerable position.

    One thing I might add is that it is a bit scarier than you might think it to be. The tone of the film is a lot darker than I expected, and at times I got a bit frightened, so it's definitely a cross-generational film for both children and adults.

    The film also feels quite long. It has a runtime of just under 2 hours, and while I get that they are trying to fit in more plot to make it cohesive, there are some sequences that just run on for a bit too long.

    Overall, though, I went into the film not expecting too much but I was blown away by the amazing CGI, the great voice acting, the absolutely AMAZING acting by Neel Sethi, and the great plot elements that really added to the film.

    A few side notes:
  • The opening Disney logo seems like a throwback to the 1967 film, as it makes us feel quite nostalgic
  • The end credits animation looks STUNNING
  • Monday, 11 April 2016

    Vietnam/Cambodia Trip: Part 1 - Siem Reap

    Over the summer holidays, my family went to visit my Dad in Vietnam for a holiday (he is based in Ho Chi Minh City), and we decided to head up to North Vietnam and Cambodia as well. I'll be doing a six part blog series on the whole trip!

    Part 1 (this blog) - Siem Reap
    Part 2 - Ha Long Bay
    Part 3 - Battambang
    Part 4 - Ho Chi Minh City
    Part 5 - Sapa and Hanoi
    Part 6 - Mekong Delta and Cu Chi Tunnels


    I'm starting this blog series off with Siem Reap because it was one of the highlights of my trip (and also because of the fact that it seemed like every single person on Facebook was also heading here these holidays).

    ----------

    Siem Reap, Cambodia
    Highlights:
  • Ta Prohm
  • Baphuon Temple
  • The coffee shops at the Siem Reap sunrise
  • Tuk tuks

    Lowlights:
  • A lot of crowds (especially at Ta Prohm)
  • It was really very tiring
  • Siem Reap is quite a touristy area (everything is aimed towards Westerners, and it doesn't give a good indication of what Cambodia is actually like) but at least they have something worth promoting and worth increasing tourism for (it ain't just tourism for the sake of tourism)
  • The Tonle Sap lake literally looks like shit

    Weather/Environment:
  • Very hot and dry
  • The heat drains all the energy you have
  • It is also very dusty especially when on the tuk tuk (i.e. don't be a fool like me... wearing white pants is a bad idea)

    Accommodation:
    We stayed at the Siem Reap Riverside Hotel, which sounds amazing but it was only alright. It is next to the river however the river is quite dirty and so it's not as amazing as it sounds. They forgot our breakfast though for the sunrise at Angkor Wat and because we didn't want to miss anything, we left with just a roll of bread in each of our hands. Also, the concierge was evidently gay and evidently trying to hit on my brother.

    Overall:
    Would definitely recommend a visit to Siem Reap; you might think that it will be really boring looking at temples all day long but each temple looks really different and it wasn't something I got bored of easily





    Sunrise at Angkor Wat

    We originally planned to arrive on the afternoon of Boxing Day, but since we had a terrible bout of food poisoning, we had to postpone our trip for a few days and ended up arriving on the evening of the 28th. Since the Angkor Wat passes activate at 5pm the following day for visitors to view the sunset, we originally wanted to do this on the 26th, but since we could only get an evening flight, we had to skip out on the sunset.

    Thankfully, we were still able to go to the sunrise the following day on the 29th. We woke up at about 4am to leave our hotel at 4:30am to arrive at Angkor Wat around 5am. We bought the passes, which has a photo of you printed on the ticket and makes for a good souvenir.



    The sunrise was one of the craziest things we experienced. Not because of the actual sunrise (it was a bit anticlimactic after waiting over 1.5 hours for an okay view), but because of the environment. There were crowds of people with selfie sticks blocking views, there were vendors laying out artworks and painting the sunrise as it occurred, and there was just a lot of energy for so early in the morning.

    I bought this painting at the sunrise!

    The craziest thing, however, were the market vendors. In the pitch black of the pre-dawn, we had a tiny Cambodian man with a large and rounded head come up to us and ask, "Would you like a coffee?", shining a torchlight on a laminated menu of hot drinks.

    We told him, "No thank you."

    He then told us not to stand where we were standing, as we would only see four of the Angkor Wat pillars. He ushered us to another section (which he claimed was the best position for taking photos) and showed us a photo on his phone showing us the view from that spot and how we would be able to see all five pillars (although that photo he showed us was definitely nothing like whatever we saw).

    We thanked him, to which he would reply, "Will you come to my shop after the sunrise?"

    We said, "Yes, if we want a drink we'll come to your shop."

    He then said, "Okay. My shop is Number 5. You come to my shop after the sunrise."

    "Shop Number 5, okay!"

    To our shock, he then responds, "Yes, my shop is Number 5. My name is Harry Potter!"

    "Harry Potter?!?!"

    And he walked away.

    The shock factor of it all definitely made us remember his name and shop number.



    Later, another shopkeeper came up to us asking if we wanted any seats (the sun would only rise at about 6:40am), since everyone was standing. We happily accepted this offer, only for him to ask whether we could go to his shop (Number 10, my name is Jame [pronounced Chiam]) after the sunrise in exchange for the seats. We said we would, and were shocked yet again when Harry Potter appears seemingly out of thin air (my brother says he must know how to apparate) and goes, "But what about me?! You said you would come to my shop!"

    We hastily had to assure him we would go to his shop as well as Jame's, since we had a family of four and could split up.

    That morning was filled with bizarre experiences, including witnessing the cunning tactics of shopkeepers. Jame brought out 4 chairs for us, but my mother and brother never sat down, and I only sat down sometimes, so most of the time our seats were unoccupied, and if someone else came and sat on them, Jame would ask my dad if he knew them, and if he didn't, Jame would ask the person sitting down whether or not they were going to buy coffee off him. If they said no, he would ask them, "But... you're sitting on my chair!" (He had written on the back of the chair that it was his at Shop Number 10) "If you are not going to buy coffee from my shop, you have to pay me $2 for using the chair!"

    Another thing I overheard:

    "Don't forget to come to my shop! My name is Rambo 2!"

    "Rambo 2?! I'm definitely not forgetting that!"

    (I later saw that there was, indeed, a shop named Rambo 1 right next to Rambo 2)



    After the sunrise occurred, my dad was already at Jame's shop at Number 10 while my brother and I made our way towards the shops. We saw our dad at Number 10, and we see Jame waving his hands frantically at us saying, "Yes, over here! I am Jame, my shop is Number 10!".

    Once again, out of nowhere, Harry Potter has apparated in front of us saying, "But you said you would come to my shop! My shop is Number 5, I am Harry Potter!" We agreed we would go to his shop and followed him. He disappeared and I was about to sit at a seat at Number 5 when my brother wanted to sit in the shade at a seat at Number 4, Lady Gaga's shop.

    I said, "But isn't he Number 5? This is Lady Gaga..."

    To which, once again, Harry Potter apparates out of nowhere and says, "Doesn't matter. Same same. Harry Potter, Lady Gaga, same same."

    Meanwhile, Jame is really upset that we sat at Number 5, and he asks my dad why we are at Number 5. My dad says we agreed to split up because both Jame and Harry Potter helped us, and once my mum is done taking photos, she will come to Number 10.

    So then Jame goes all the way to where my mum is taking photos (he probably walked 100m just to get to her) and asks her if she will be going to his shop. She told him she would, and he says, "But... your children are with Harry Potter!"

    And my mum had to say, "Look, don't worry. I will sit with you."




    So that experience was definitely something. It surprised me how they knew how to give us that shock factor to catch our attention. There were all sorts of names on those signs, such as James Bond and even Manny Pacquiao, so it was evident they even kept up to date with what were the latest popular things in the Western world.

    Another thing was that when Jame and Harry Potter first saw us, we were in the complete dark. Sure he might have shined a torch at us, but I don't remember him doing that (and I surely would have remembered being blinded by a torchlight in the pitch black). Even then, in the broad daylight the both of them could spot us from so far away and even run up to us and shout at us to go to their shop.

    We also weren't the only ones; while we were sitting down we could see all these shopkeepers running up to people saying, "You are coming to my shop, yes? You said you would buy coffee from my shop! My shop is Number (whatever) and my name is (whatever)!"

    To think that they do this every day, remembering people, trying to get people to promise they will go to their shops, and just relying on the moral obligations of people is amazing, and something that I will never forget.



    Apart from that, Angkor Wat was actually not that amazing. The walkway was interesting; you could see monkeys on the trees next to the walkway, you could see how the rails had collapsed in certain areas, and you could see how the huge Angkor Wat slowly became larger and larger until it was looming up above your head.



    It was only 9am or so, but it was starting to get real hot. The temple itself was not that amazing to look at. I mean, it was huge, but everything was just sort of all the same.

    There was also this long line of people wanting to get to the top of one pillar, which didn't even look that high, and we just couldn't be bothered waiting around for so long (the line was huuuuuuge, snaking it's way around the side of that block).




    Ta Prohm

    Up next was Ta Prohm, my favourite temple of all.

    At first you have to walk through this short trail in the forest, and you pass by a band playing music, and the entire band is consisted of victims of land mines, so they have missing legs, missing arms, some are blind, etc.



    Shortly after, you get to Ta Prohm.

    More commonly known as the Lara Croft temple, this temple is famous for the trees which have planted their roots into the walls of the temple.

    The famous Lara Croft tree! I have better pics of the whole tree, but they all have random Asian tourists in them

    I'm the type of person that loves nature, and loves looking at how things grow. I find it so fascinating to see how roots and trees behave differently in different environments, and so I loved this entire temple.

    The temple was great because you could catch a break from the sun and just loiter around the shade, but the one downside was that there were immense crowds. There was a line for posing in front of the Lara Croft tree, and at the end there was literally no space to breathe. Everyone was so cramped in the temple trying to get out, you would have thought we were at some rock concert or something.



    Angkor Thom

    Our last stop was Angkor Thom, a huge kingdom that comprises of three main temples/features.

    First up was the Terrace of Elephants.

    (Sorry about the quality of this photo - it was a really bright, sunny and HOT day and this was taken on my phone, not my mum's camera)

    It was nothing special but had some really intricate artworks sculpted into the walls and an interesting elephant feature.



    Next up was the Baphuon Temple.

    It had this long walkway and at this stage we were all sweating profusely, the heat draining all the energy from our limbs, and when my brother and my mum saw the walkway, they just sat down.



    I'm not even kidding they gave up entirely and my dad and I were left to look at the Temple (and thus, all the photos of Baphuon will be phone photos so there is a dip in quality of photos in this section).



    I really liked this temple because my perfectionism loved the neat and organisational layout of it. It was pretty much a square temple, so you just walk around until you get to the stairs, then you climb to the next level.



    Speaking of stairs though, there were so many very tiny and very steep stairs, it was so exhausting, but it gave us a really good view of the area, and I was pretty upset that my brother and mum missed out on this great experience.



    The last section of Angkor Thom was the Bayon Temple, a big temple famous for the heads of Bayon.

    This temple wasn't super impressive after the Baphuon temple though.



    Pub Street

    At night, there is the famous Pub Street to visit. It's got a lot of shops, a lot of souvenirs, quite a few massage parlours, and a fair share of interestingly weird foods (think spiders and crickets).



    It's also not just one street, as the name might suggest, but a collection of small laneways to go through, so you can spend quite a bit of time here.

    After a full day of walking, my mum and I got foot massages done as well.



    Other than that, there's not that much going down that is worth the words, except the fact that mthey have fried spiders and stuff like that.



    Tonle Sap Lake

    Yeh don't even bother with this one. There are some cool stilt houses on the lake but the lake is nothing special. It literally looks like shit. The water is all brown and muddy and the surrounding areas aren't even that great. I thought our taxi driver took us to the wrong area but I spoke to others about it and nope, everyone just saw boring and underwhelming brown water.

    I couldn't find a single good picture of the lake so here's a funny picture of an "Audi" tuk tuk (and actually it is a really great quality tuk tuk compared to all the other tuk tuks there)
  • Saturday, 2 April 2016

    Movie Reviews in Five Dotpoints or Less - Part VIII

    Before Sunrise (1995)

    8.1/10 on IMDb
    100% on Rotten Tomatoes

    Chloe's thoughts: Signed, sealed and recommended by Chloe
    Watch it if you: Like romance without all the cheesy cliches; Want something to watch on a sad and rainy day; Don't mind feeling a bit sad/empty after watching this

  • Ethan Hawke is super cute in this
  • The writing was great; the film had a lot of amazing dialogue and I also fell in love with the poem that was written
  • The actors were so convincing and natural, I felt like I was actually just following two strangers who were talking for the first time; every thing about how they moved their hands, how they laughed, and how they spoke made it seem ad-libbed
  • Linklater also did a great job at directing; there were a lot of amazing long takes, which just solidified how amazing the actors were at making the dialogue so natural (I am a sucker for long takes; have a long take in a film and I will most likely like it)
  • Overall it was a good film with an interesting premise and it was done really well


    Before Sunset (2004)

    8.0/10 on IMDb
    95% on Rotten Tomatoes

    Chloe's thoughts: Signed, sealed and recommended by Chloe
    Watch it if you: Liked the first film; Want to feel even sadder than you did with the first movie

  • Even more heartbreaking
  • Ethan Hawke still looking great
  • Julie Delpy also looks really great here
  • The acting is still amazing with the natural dialogue and long takes you love from the first film; it also engages you in some really genuine and philosophical conversations
  • Better than the first one


    San Andreas (2015)

    6.2/10 on IMDb
    50% on Rotten Tomatoes

    Chloe's thoughts: Low-energy entertainment
    Watch it if you: Like the Rock; Find amusement in watching disaster movies so you can poke a bit of fun at them

  • Isn't it funny that this film on an earthquake along the San Andreas fault stars Dwayne Johnson? (You know... because he's The Rock and earthquakes are just moving rocks?)
  • Jokes aside this was an alright film for some mindless entertainment
  • To me it just didn't make sense that he kind of neglected his job for the sake of his family; like I know in reality that is understandable, but not once did they really have a scene of his boss telling him like, "Yo where you at there's like 500 people here who need help?"
  • But in the end, it's just a blockbuster film made for entertainment, so who cares about that stuff


    The Intern (2015)

    7.2/10 on IMDb
    60% on Rotten Tomatoes

    Chloe's thoughts: Low-energy entertainment
    Watch it if you: Want to watch a fun chick-flick that's not the same as your usual sappy romance; Like Anne Hathaway; Like Robert De Niro; Have your girl friends over and are thinking of watching something light

  • Robert De Niro stars as a retired and bored man who stumbles across the opportunity to kill some of his spare time by joining an internship at a company led by a young and ambitious boss, played by Anne Hathaway
  • It's a pretty interesting and light-hearted comedy; the premise is unique and it's not a Rom-com, but more like a... friend-com?
  • The (platonic) chemistry between Anne Hathaway and Robert De Niro was pretty great, and even though it was not a serious film you could still see how great Anne Hathaway is as an actor
  • So I would say this is actually an enjoyable time if you're thinking of watching it maybe with a few friends during a chicks night in or something
  • The only huge issue was that there was one sequence that was just so ridiculous and unnecessary in the film (if you watch the film, you'd know what scene I'm talking about - it is 100% cringe-worthy ridiculous)