Thursday 20 July 2017

Survival is not fair.

Dunkirk (2017)


9.6/10 on IMDb
96% on Rotten Tomatoes

Chloe's thoughts: A must see;
Watch it in cinemas;
I'm buying the DVD

Watch it if you: Want to see an intense and suspenseful war drama;
Aren't expecting any action or combat sequences that you would associate with other war films;
Aren't expecting anything like what Christopher Nolan has previously done (in terms of mind-blow stuff);
But still want an amazing film!


Usually when I hear that Christopher Nolan is doing another movie, I'm immediately excited for it. But I didn't know it would be possible for me to be even more excited when I heard that Christopher Nolan was doing a war movie.

In WWII, 400,000 British troops are stranded on the beaches of Dunkirk. The film follows the experiences of three groups of troops: those on land, those in the sea, and those up in the air, as they await either their rescue, or their death.

I think I subconsciously built up a lot of pressure from this film, because after the film ended, I was legitimately so happy with what I had just seen!


Yup, Christopher Nolan has done it again! And this time, instead of another phantasmagorically complex mind-blow twist of a movie, this historical war drama is very different from what we typically see from Nolan, and even from other war films.

For a start, it's not a typical war drama. It's not a film where troops rush into battle, heroically fighting off their enemies. Nope, the Germans themselves are never to be seen, the troops almost never fire their weapons, and there's hardly any dialogue. Instead, the film is nearly two hours of intense suspension, where you anxiously wait in the shoes of the British troops. You feel a sliver of the amount of terror that they must have felt, you sit hopeless as you watch these men stand hopeless, waiting to be bombed on the beach or sunk in their ship or gunned down in the air. There's not much you can do, because there's just not much the characters themselves can do.

It's a dire situation, and it's nervewracking to see failed attempt after failed attempt of troops trying to board a ship and leave the beach of doom. But at the same time it's quite uplifting, even in the midst of the chaos. It's a huge relief when you see even just one German plane get gunned down, or just one British soldier get pulled up out of the water and onto a boat. It's uplifting to see how patriotic and selfless some can be even in the face of guaranteed death. It's heartwarming to see comrade aid comrade, even when all seems hopeless.


The soundtrack by Hans Zimmer is fantastic at setting the tones of these scenes. The ticking clock as the soldiers count down to their deaths, the tense and repetitive music as we sit on the edges of our seats, and sometimes even the deafening silence as a German plane approaches Dunkirk.

To be honest, I can't find any faults in this film. I think it was a perfect representation of the difficulties of war when combat isn't even in the picture. It's emotional, and it makes you question what you would do to survive. It was also pretty cool to see the events play out over different time spans (on land: one week; on sea: one day; in air: one hour). Watching some reviews of this film, I see that some critics don't really like the structure of this film, because of the different time spans, however I really did not see the issue with it. It wasn't confusing to me, it wasn't like the film was jumping back and forth through time points, it was just shifting perspectives, and I actually liked the way he did this.

Another critique I see other people talking about is the lack of background story for characters. I had no issue with this because to me the film was done so well that I didn't need to know what their family was like, who they had waiting at home, or what their hobbies were, for me to actually care about the tragic situation they were facing.

If I had to nitpick I'd say that the one flaw is it's probably not that rewatchable, but that's not really a flaw with the film, it's just a flaw with the subject matter.

The acting is nothing spectacular, but there was absolutely nothing wrong with it. Because it's an ensemble cast, there is a relatively equal spread of focus on characters. If you had to pick a main character, it would be Tommy, played by Fionn Whitehead, who is only 20 years old and for this to be his acting debut is amazing. Looking forward to seeing him in more films.

Speaking of acting debuts, Harry Styles is in this! I only heard about this the day before watching the film, and was slightly worried, but he did a good job too. I was worried he would try to overact or dramatise his role, but like all the other actors in this film, there was nothing over-the-top and it was quite realistic and believable, and he wasn't a distraction in the film. Also, his presence in the movie might explain the numerous groups of young, teen-looking girls who were in the cinema for the advanced screening of this film...


Tom Hardy as the pilot Farrier was great. There was even a scene which was reminiscent of Bane x Mad Max so that was awesome.

Mark Rylance's scenes were also decent, but again nothing overly special. Although he seems a lot taller (unintended BFG (2016) reference) than I remember him being in Bridge of Spies (2015), but perhaps that is because he was up next to Tom Hanks.

Also, I would have liked to have seen more of Kenneth Branagh and Cillian Murphy, but on the other hand any more scenes with them would have been unecessary so I understand the decision to let them only have brief appearances.

So while the acting was nothing Oscar-worthy, it was a strong enough cast to make the film believable and none of the actors overdid it, which meant we didn't have anything to distract us from the glorious directing and cinematography.

In the end I think this is a fantastic film that everyone needs to watch. While it is a war film, it's not action-packed liked Saving Private Ryan (1998) is. It's still a drama at the end of the day, and it's a really refreshing take on your typical Hollywood war film.

Thursday 13 July 2017

He puts the 'Asian' in 'Home Invasion'

Baby Driver (2017)


8.3/10 on IMDb
96% on Rotten Tomatoes

Chloe's thoughts: Signed, sealed, and recommended by Chloe;
Watch it in cinemas;
I'm buying the DVD (maybe)

Watch it if you: Are a fan of other Edgar Wright movies;
Want some cool chase scenes in a fast-paced and fun heist movie;
Are a fan of any of the actors in this film;
Are keen to see what an action musical film would be like

In this latest film by Edgar Wright, Baby is a talented getaway driver doing dodgy business for a crime boss, driving to the beat of his own personal playlist. He longs for the day that he can break free from these jobs and start a new life with a clean slate.

I was super keen for this movie since the trailer looked amazing, and the cast and director looked solid, and it didn't disappoint! It was such a solid movie, and will be one of the best of the year.


The amazing thing about this film is it's directing. The plot itself isn't anything special, since it's a pretty typical heist movie where the heist driver is doing this not because he wants to, but because of some other suspicious reason. He wants to do one last job before leaving this life of crime, but something happens that hinders his plans. Also, there's a girl he's fallen in love with.

There's also a few plot holes weaknesses, but I will elaborate on them later under spoilers.

So yeah, the film's plot isn't particularly original, but the way it was directed and edited made it a great and original film.

Baby's character is an interesting one where he needs to listen to his music to be able to concentrate or do his job properly, and the whole film reflects this. The opening sequence is a car chase where every edit, and every movement is matched to the beat of the song. Then there's a long tracking shot where Baby dances to the music he's listening to, and it's a fun moment. In other scenes you have every part of the film revolve around the beat of the music, be it the dialogue, body movements, gun shots, car door slams, things like that. It's almost like this film is a musical, but not your typical fairytale-burst-out-into-song type of musical. Instead, it's like an action musical.

This must have been so difficult to film, particularly in the long takes since everyone's body movements needed to hit the beat of the songs, and it would also have been such a task to edit. But Edgar Wright does similar cool editing nuggets in his other films too, like Shaun of the Dead (2004) and Hot Fuzz (2007), so this shouldn't come as a surprise.

This whole theme of the beat of the music made the action sequences and chase scenes really great, and the soundtrack itself was really fun.


As to the acting, Ansel Elgort stars in this film, and I was a bit worried about him because for some reason I just don't really like him as an actor. He was good at being the actual character, but there is just something weird and off about his face or his body movements. This might just be my own personal bias though, because I wasn't a huge fan of him after The Fault in Our Stars (2014) and Divergent (2014). He's much better in this film, but there's still something weird and awkward about him, for example when he's dancing or lip-syncing to songs and mucking about; it's kind of funny, but at the same time if it were someone else's face, I'd feel a lot more comfortable.

On the other hand, I really liked Lily James, who starred in Cinderella (2015). She has a really nice girl-next-door personality and vibe in this film, her accent was great, and I really enjoyed her scenes.

Jon Hamm was also really great and I think he outshined Jamie Foxx by a mile. Quite a few movie reviewers are praising Jamie Foxx but I really didn't see anything special in him being cast; I reckon he could have been replaced with another actor and I wouldn't have batted an eye. Jon Hamm, though, was really a standout.

Kevin Spacey was good too, but I feel like someone needs to talk to his tailor. He seemed really awkward, as if he was sinking into his jacket? Like his face looked normal but the rest of his body seemed really fat. This is such a minor thing but it was seriously very distracting. Apart from that, though, his lines are all fantastic and he delivers some of the best and funniest lines of the movie, despite his character being completely serious and dramatic.

In conclusion, this is probably going to be one of the best films of the year. The way it uses music as the blood and backbone of the film is really unique and makes for a great original film. The soundtrack, and all the acting and action choreography that complements the soundtrack, are great, and the movie is a fun and enjoyable ride.

A few odd plot points (Click to show/hide spoilers):

Sunday 9 July 2017

If you're nothing without the suit, then you shouldn't have it.

Spiderman: Homecoming (2017)


8.2/10 on IMDb
93% on Rotten Tomatoes

Chloe's thoughts: Signed, sealed, and recommended by Chloe;
Watch it in cinemas;
I'm buying the DVD (to complete the collection of course);
Low-energy entertainment

Watch it if you: Were disappointed by the Amazing Spiderman movies;
Want to see a fun and entertaining Spiderman;
Don't mind the emphasis on Peter Parker's high school experience;
Have seen a few Avengers films and want to see the next installment in the MCU;
Want to see what Spiderman would look like now that he's in the know with the Avengers

Here we are with another Spiderman origins movie, yet this time, Peter Parker has just come back home from his first experience with the Avengers. Living off the thrill of the events from Captain America: Civil War (2016), he struggles to balance his lifestyle as he tries to prove himself to this superhero team when he learns of the underground works of the Vulture.

I had pretty high hopes for this film, and while it was enjoyable and entertaining, I think it's hard to wholly love it when it's the third Spiderman we've seen. Don't get me wrong, though, I do think it's the best Spiderman, and I really enjoyed some of the new takes they put on his origin story, but it did feel a bit long as the film shows many things that we've already seen on the big screen under the Spiderman name.


Yup, we've seen it before, over and over again, we know that Peter Parker is nerdy, awkward, and we know how he's like around the girls that he crushes on. So seeing this again makes the movie feel very long, and I think even if we hadn't seen the previous two lots of Spiderman, there's still a lot of focus on Peter Parker's high school experience. This can be refreshing, and it can make the characters feel very genuine and relatable, but at the same time, you go in wanting to see really cool Spiderman action sequences.

Having said that, though, the action scenes were still very entertaining and good. They weren't anything epic, but they were decent.

One example is with the scene of the ship splitting in two. When we watch the trailers, it's very reminiscent of the Spiderman 2 (2004) train scene, but in the actual movie, it's nowhere near as riveting or suspenseful as the train. The scene feels rushed, and really chaotic, with too many things going on. It also doesn't feel like there's as much at stake, and the whole scene ends fairly quickly. So the scene was good, but it wasn't anything amazing.

And I think the rest of the film can be summarised as that too: good, but nothing amazing. I was surprised at the 94% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, but the average rating is actually a 7.7/10, which seems more reasonable.

I actually really love this shot because Zendaya's character really reminded me of that weird chick from The Breakfast Club (1985), it was a great nod to it.

What I liked about this is that it was very entertaining. It was funny, and the focus on the high school made Peter Parker seem very genuine.

It also helps that Tom Holland is actually the right age to play Peter Parker, and he's also very cute. Tobey Maguire was 27 years old when the first Spiderman (2002) was released, and he looks like a goofball. Andrew Garfield was 29 when The Amazing Spiderman (2012) came out, and while he looks young, he also looks very weird (like his head is too narrow?). So I was really happy with Tom Holland, the cutest and youngest Spiderman.

The film was also entertaining through its tie-ins with the Avengers universe. It's great that Spiderman is finally being able to be used in Marvel films, which means we can see what it means that Tony Stark, Iron Man himself, is mentoring Spiderman. This brings great implications for what Spiderman's suit is like, what sort of activities Spiderman does, whether Spiderman will be fighting alongside Avengers members, and even what Spiderman's motives for crime-fighting are. I think this brought a different spin on the story we all know too well and it was refreshing to see how Spiderman's actions and thoughts changed because of the Avengers being involved in the film.

Of course what this means is that it's harder to enjoy this movie as a standalone film. Someone who has not seen the other films, specifically the Avengers and Civil War, would find it hard to follow along. This problem is more prominent in the beginning, and the rest of the film can be a bit of a standalone, but there's still a really strong link to the rest of the MCU.

Of course, though, as a fan of the franchise, I enjoyed these Marvel tie-ins. Seeing Robert Downey Jr, and even the Stark and Avengers buildings, were great.


Michael Keaton was also great, and his character was pretty interesting and very cool. He's a very resourceful villain, and they made his backstory a bit more believable, which is surprising because usually Marvel villains are terribly written! You actually kind of feel sorry for him because he wasn't really doing anything large-scale diabolical like in other MCU films.

It's been a few days since I saw the film, and months since I saw the trailer, but I still can't get over the fact that Michael Keaton is actually playing Birdman. And considering that Birdman is a self-aware characterisation of Michael Keaton's Batman, and that the Avengers movie was shown in Birdman (2014) itself, there are so many levels of meta, I love it.

I also really liked Ned, who is Peter Parker's best friend. He was great as the comedic sidekick buddy.

Zendaya was also surprisingly good, but they make a decision with her character at the end that I'm not too sure about. It seemed out of character and not in keeping with the original Spiderman storylines, but we'll see how it goes I suppose.

I really liked the ending of this film, I thought it was great that Spiderman was finally taking up the MAN part of his name. He's been Spiderman for a while, but he's finally no longer a boy, and he's making very adult and mature decisions, and that helps him to be recognised and acknowledged for it.

So all in all, this was a great Spiderman film, possibly the best ever although I don't know if I'm just saying that because I haven't seen the Tobey Maguire ones in a while. Some of it wasn't as intense as the Tobey Maguire films, and the film seemed very long, but it was still very fun and entertaining. Tom Holland and Michael Keaton are great, and I really liked how they put a different spin on Spiderman's origin story. I'm very keen to see Spiderman fight alongside the Avengers in the upcoming films, and keen to see more of Tom Holland in Hollywood.

A few side notes:
  • Good to see the little Indian kid from the Grand Budapest Hotel (2014) here!
  • Also found it interesting how everyone who bullies Peter Parker is actually within his friend group, i.e. the academic decathlon team
  • There is one mid-credits scene and one end-credits scene; not going to spoil them but I was entertained by them
  • And Tom Holland's American accent is on point! I didn't realise he was British until I saw interviews of him

  • Monday 3 July 2017

    The next time you're unsure of what to do, remember the Sad Astronaut.

    Rough Night (2017)


    5.5/10 on IMDb
    48% on Rotten Tomatoes

    Chloe's thoughts: It's alright;
    Low-energy entertainment

    Watch it if you: Are a fan of ScarJo;
    Want to watch a mindless movie in the background;
    Want a fun chick flick that you can laugh about how stupid it is

    Jess reunites with her college friends for her bachelorette weekend trip in Miami. It starts off as a fun night, but when their male stripper ends up dead at their beach house, chaos ensues.

    I'm really not used to watching comedies in theatres, or at all, really. I expected this movie to be quite crap, because I think most comedies are, but it was actually quite enjoyable. It is still such a stupid movie, but it did have me laughing a lot!


    I think what made this comedy stand out for me while I was watching it was that the film goes beyond just a regular comedy movie. I knew going in that the male stripper was going to die, but the actual scene was quite a shock. I thought he would die in a really hilarious and random way, but in the movie there was a huge shift in tone and it was actually quite a dramatic way for him to die. I genuinely felt very unsettled and terrified during his death scene, but they still had some pretty humorous moments sprinkled in throughout the scene, and after this scene it starts getting funnier and it's a different type of humour compared to the beginning part of the film.

    What makes this film isn't really the writing, but the actual acting of some of the cast members. Scarjo has some great comedic chops, and it didn't hurt that she's so beautiful. She's obviously the star of the movie and I'm impressed with her comedic abilities as I don't think I've seen her in any comedy yet.

    I am also a huge fan of Zoe Kravitz, it's great seeing her going from X-Men: First Class (2011), to Divergent (2014), to more serious acting gigs such as Mad Max: Fury Road (2015) and Big Little Lies (2017), which I haven't actually seen but I've heard she's pretty good in it. She also looks super fab in this movie.

    Kate McKinnon, though, I felt went very over the top in this movie. A lot of people really liked her here so maybe it's just an issue with her Aussie accent, but I did think she was overacting quite a lot.

    So all in all this was actually a pretty enjoyable film. It's stupid and silly but if you go in with low expectations just wanting to laugh at a B movie, then it's a good watch.