Thursday, 17 December 2015

I did my waiting... 32 years of it!

Star Wars: The Force Awakens (2015)


9.0/10 on IMDb
95% on Rotten Tomatoes

I still remember when news of Episode VII first dropped, and my then boyfriend didn't understand the hype. Knowing he was/is a huge fan of Harry Potter, I explained it like this: Imagine that, 30 years from now, they make a Harry Potter 9, and Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, and Emma Watson are all in the film. Hype much?

Now, within the last year (or more specifically the last few months), there has been some crazy wild speculation occurring about the film. Is Jar Jar Binks a Sith Lord? Is Luke Skywalker going to be Kylo Ren's mentor? Is Luke Skywalker even going to be IN the film? Is Rey actually Luke's daughter? Is she Han and Leia's daughter? Is BB8 just another gimmick to sell toys?

All very good questions, but you'll have to watch the movie to find out (or, at least, you won't find out from reading this review). It's actually really hard for me to sit here and want to write a review on it, because I don't want to divulge ANYTHING about the film. I don't even want to give minor and irrelevant spoilers that you will discover in the first five minutes, because I went in this film knowing only what was in the trailers and it was amazing to just have that experience of not knowing anything about the plot or the characters (the last time I went into a theatre knowing nothing about a film was Mad Max: Fury Road - I don't think I even saw the trailers). Of course, the atmosphere of hundreds of geeks getting hyped for the midnight premiere also contributed to the experience... I think it will be hard to forget Michael's ridiculous smile plastered over his face, but it's even harder to forget how that smile was plastered on every single person in the IMAX lobby, which seemed to be buzzing on its own like a living creature. Unlike Cinderella, we wanted midnight to come.

So the experience was amazing, but what about the actual film?

Well firstly I have to say how great it was to watch it at IMAX, one of only 20 cinemas across the entire planet to have the 2D 1570 print of the film, which means bigger screens, and more images to soak in. Seriously, check out the comparison of the two formats here. It was beautiful.

In terms of the actual plot, it's really hard for me to not give anything away. I will talk more about the plot later, but all I will say right now is that there is a heavy sense of déjà vu throughout the film This is not an original plot; we've definitely seen it before.

The characters need a bit more focus, though. Without spoiling anything, I don't think they did a very good job at building the characters. The movie mainly focuses on two of the three main characters, and only one of these has a solid character arc. But of course these characters are pretty well defined. You can see who is the Han Solo-esque comic relief, you can see who is the Luke Skywalker-esque heart and soul of the film, and the actors were good enough that you could actually believe in them.

As for the secondary characters, these were less convincing. As the film started, characters such as Kylo Ren were portrayed fantastically, but as the film continues, some of these characters become less and less interesting. If anything, they become more of a subject to laugh at. You start questioning to yourself: is this person a legitimate threat, or are they just in their dark, angsty teenage years?

One great thing about the characters that the original trilogy did not have is the strong female presence. I know, I know, it just sounds like I'm rattling off some feminism campaign thing, but it was actually a good change. Just think about the original trilogy, where you just had Leia. Sure, she was amazing and capable of holding her own amongst a crew of men, but she was the ONLY female we cared about. This film, on the other hand, gives us more to choose from, and personally I felt spoilt for choice. I mean hey, it even passes the Bechdel Test.

Okay, so back to the plot. As I said, it was nothing original, but what did stand out was the massive number of plot holes in this film. Seriously, the first half of this film was like pure perfection. I'm not too sure if it was just because of the hype and adrenaline running through me making the first half amazing, but it must be saying something if that adrenaline cannot carry through all the way to the end of the film.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not hating on the film. I still thoroughly enjoyed it and thought the whole film was great. It's just that there were a few bits and pieces which just... didn't make sense!

There are several moments which are just pretty ridiculous and occur with no explanation, and the more you think about those moments, the more confused you get. Why did they do that? Why DIDN'T they do that? How did they KNOW to do that? Why was that SO EASY? Was that even realistic (as far as space movies go)?

Apart form the actual plot, some of the dialogue was not that great either. It wasn't terrible whiny-Anakin-esque dialogue, but it was pretty obvious that some scenes were done specifically for the trailer, because there would be a huge shift in tone or it would just seem so out of place.

So this is the type of film where you might walk out thinking that it was such a great and near-perfect film, but the longer you sit down to think about it, the more you realise that some of it just didn't make any sense! Maybe some of it will be explained in episodes VIII and IX, but some of them are irreparable and will forever remain on the same level as the plot holes in The Dark Knight Rises (okay, maybe not that bad - at least no one looks at someone's eyes and then can 'just tell' that they are Batman).

But in the end, of course this film was worth the watch and worth the extra costs associated with a midnight premiere in IMAX. And that is definitely saying something when it comes from a grandma trapped in a 20 year old body (seriously, this was my first ever midnight screening! I skipped out on Harry Potter 8 and Hunger Games 4 simply because it didn't seem worth not having my beauty sleep).

Sure, the first half is much much much better than the second half, but the film is definitely not a let down to the hype (I kept asking myself, "What if it's like Indiana Jones 4?"). The atmosphere of going to the midnight screening was also amazing; I loved seeing real life Kylo Ren, clapping with glee when the Lucasfilm logo came up, and cheering whenever a cameo occurred (and trust me, there are LOTS of cameos - even the AT-AT makes an appearance). If you are even a semi fan of Star Wars, you will appreciate this. The only thing is that if you have not seen the previous films (at least the originals), then I think you won't have a clue what is happening. But that's good, it just gives you more reason to watch this great franchise!

A few side notes:
  • Dat feel when you have to fully turn your head just to read the opening scroll on that huge IMAX screen
  • The two guys from The Raid had a cameo and I seriously wish they had more screen time
  • Daisy Ridley seriously reminds me of Keira Knightley
  • Favourite character of the film? Maz Kanata.
  • Saturday, 5 December 2015

    Movie Reviews in Five Dotpoints or Less - Part V

    Pulp Fiction (1994)


    8.9/10 on IMDb
    93% on Rotten Tomatoes

  • The dialogue in this is perfection
  • I had to think long and hard about what my favourite scene was and ... I just wasn't sure! Even now I have a few in mind but they're all just so great!
  • From the start to the end you are entertained with ingenius dialogue, absurd situations, and some really bad luck (and an awesome moment of great luck)
  • Highly recommend this; the non-linear narrative, the amazing directing, and the great acting will make you dying to rewatch it


    Warrior (2011)


    8.2/10 on IMDb
    82% on Rotten Tomatoes

  • Tom Hardy and Joel Edgerton were great in this, playing two estranged boxing brothers trying their shot at the biggest MMA competition in the nation
  • The film is pretty interesting, and can be quite intense; the actors are amazing and this film is worth a watch, but might not be for everyone


    Maleficent (2014)


    7.0/10 on IMDb
    49% on Rotten Tomatoes

  • Not as bad as I thought it would be, but maybe my expectations were just really low
  • At the beginning, the dialogue and acting is just terrible and the CGI of all the magical creatures is so bad, but later it gets better
  • I have always loved Maleficent; I think she is the best Disney villain; it was interesting to see this new take on her back story and while it doesn't really 'explain' much because they just change her and her dialogue, it adds a new perspective and brings up some interesting points about everything
  • It's enjoyable if you're really into Disney, really into Sleeping Beauty, or have kids, but it's nothing special


    Shaun of the Dead


    8.0/10 on IMDb
    92% on Rotten Tomatoes

  • A great comedy on Simon Pegg, Nick Frost, and zombies
  • The first of the Cornetto Trilogy
  • Sometimes it can drag on a bit, so while it has it's fair share of funny moments, some scenes can make your eyes drift towards the clock
  • Great acting though, from Simon Pegg and Nick Frost especially
  • Would recommend if you were looking for a mindless zombie film that will give you a few good laughs too


    Hot Fuzz


    7.9/10 on IMDb
    91% on Rotten Tomatoes

  • The second of the Cornetto Trilogy
  • This film is such a great parody of the cliche action genre; it just has fantastic self-awareness and pokes fun at itself as well as other action movies
  • They even mention all the cliches we see in cop movies and then they go ahead and do these cliches
  • Excellent writing from Simon Pegg and Edgar Wright; they were able to make this a great and hilarious comedy without making it too ridiculous - I'm not kidding, there are moments where we are incredibly invested in what is going to happen next and how some characters might be hurt, etc.
  • I haven't seen The World's End yet, so I can't say for sure if this is the best of the trilogy, but it's definitely better than Shaun of the Dead, and it gets me really keen for The World's End
  • Sunday, 29 November 2015

    A Kite Dancing in a Hurricane

    Spectre (2015)


    7.1/10 on IMDb
    64% on Rotten Tomatoes

    Chloe's thoughts: Low-energy entertainment
    Watch this if you: Want to be disappointed in a James Bond film; have nothing better to do; have friends over and aren't sure what is a good film to watch while everyone is talking over it; want to watch beautiful cars but not beautiful chase scenes; want to be let down by a villain who was hyped up quite a lot

    Man I was pretty keen on seeing Spectre since I was having exams when it came out, but then I heard all these negative reviews about it! People were comparing it to the god forsaken Quantum of Solace, and I suddenly became terrified. I still had hope for it though, because the trailers looked amazing.

    In the end, it was still pretty decent. The main issue was that it was super super long, with a total run time of 2.5 hours.

    On top of that, the villain was terrible. Don't get me wrong, Christoph Waltz as per usual was great, but they seriously wasted his talent. His character didn't do ANYTHING and his part of the story was completely unconvincing. We all saw that menacing shot of him in the trailer; they hyped it up heaps for us and all for what? Nothing! His character was pathetic.

    Another thing is that they tried to tie in some events of the other three films, but they did this so sloppily; the script was terribly unconvincing, and then on top of that you add the villain's unconvincing backstory and you get a waste of a great talent.

    But okay, surely it wasn't as bad as Quantum of Solace, right?!

    Well, there were actually some good points about this film.

    Firstly, Daniel Craig is sexier than ever here. He's just so suave in this! Yeh, okay, maybe the rough and careless Daniel Craig Bond we all know and love now does care that his martinis should be shaken and not stirred (I'm not kidding, this was actually a point that a movie critic brought up), but you can tell that the whole film is still continuing with his rule-breaking, impulsive and unpredictable legacy.

    David Bautista (Drax the Destroyer himself) was great in this, and made any fight scene he was involved in great.

    Unfortunately, though, the first car chase scene was really nothing special. But, luckily the cars are beautiful enough for you to be distracted for the overly tame nature of the car chase.

    The best thing I loved about this film though...the open sequence. My absolute love for long takes made me fall in love with this film right at the beginning. That single tracking shot in the Day of the Dead parade was so fantastically done, it made me so happy.

    Then we get to the title sequence, and it just goes downhill. Like, it wasn't bad but it was just really weird for a bond film. It had a lot more realistic imagery in it, rather than cartoons and graphics overlaid on top of one another. It was also weird because it sort of alluded to things that were going to happen in the film, thus the title sequence even acted as a mild spoiler. It also kind of refreshed your memory of the first three films, which made it more obvious and less fun when you 'discovered' how this movie linked to the first three films.

    So overall, I went in to this with a really low expectation, but honestly, it was alright. It's not as great as Casino Royale or Skyfall, but it's definitely better than Quantum of Solace. If anything, just watch it for the opening Day of the Dead sequence; that one long take, as well as all the costumes... simply amazing. The entire cast still does a great job, the cars are beautiful, and some of the action scenes were great. The only issues are that it was (and, more importantly, felt) super long, and the way they wrote the villain was terrible unconvincing. Apart from that, I still think it's worth the watch.

    A few side notes:
  • I can't take any scenes of Moriarty seriously
  • Q is so sassy and cute
  • Every time I see someone's thumbs over someone's eyes, I will never not think of The Mountain That Rides
  • I wasn't not sure why I didn't like any of the scenes that C was involved in (besides the fact that he's just Moriarty), until I saw a movie review saying it was too much like Mission Impossible
  • Sam Smith you are great
  • Tuesday, 24 November 2015

    You Love Me. Real or Not Real?

    The Hunger Games: Mockingjay, Part 2 (2015)


    7.3/10 on IMDb
    70% on Rotten Tomatoes

    After my last exam on Friday in the blistering 40 degree heat, I was sooooo excited to watch this! My love for Jennifer Lawrence and Suzanne Collins' Hunger Games trilogy is no stranger to anyone, and the film did not disappoint!

    The film opens up right where it left us at the end of Part 1, and continues on the war between the Rebels and the Capitol. We see that District 13 is attempting to rally and unify the other districts to gather enough force to take down the Capitol. Without the unification of all districts, theirs is a helpless cause.

    There is inherently going to be a problem with splitting up a book into two films. The first film of course had it's slow moments, but I guess I didn't really notice them. Similarly, I saw reviews of this film arguing that the pacing did not really work out well, as there were moments that dragged on for quite a while. To be honest, I didn't notice the pacing issues in this film AT ALL. With the first film I could see where non-book-readers would start to get bored, but I've been trying to think back about the film and see what pacing issues it had. Maybe it's because I'm biased with my love for Jennifer Lawrence, Josh Hutcherson, and the trilogy itself, but I think the pacing was fine.

    While the ending to this trilogy is not as epic as endings to other franchises (there's no big boss fight or anything), it did a fantastic job at sticking to the storyline, mainly only changing things for the sake of keeping the total run time down to 2 hours and 17 minutes. Another thing I love about the storyline is that it shows you the reality of war. I have a feeling I talked about this in my review on Part 1 and when I reviewed the novel, but the film does a great job at showing you the consequences of war. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder is very real, and Katniss suffers from in it Part 1. In this film, there's even more about the effects of being a POW especially with the Capitol's instruments of torture. There's also the idea that war is brutal; not everyone is going to live, and if they do live, do they get to live a good life?

    The action in this film is pretty great; they had some really good scenes and it brought you back to the action and arena-styled fighting in the first two movies.

    Jennifer Lawrence's acting was also great in this, she kept it real and grounded in the character of Katniss and it was completely believable. Liam Hemsworth's acting was alright too, nothing special, but I think Josh Hutcherson did a pretty great job as the broken Peeta.

    A few downsides to this film were that I wasn't too sure if non-book-readers would be able to understand some of the stuff that was happening or being said. I don't think they did a very good job at taking into consideration the non-readers in the audience, and I would have liked for them to explain or go into a bit more detail for certain things. Another thing is that Johanna Mason is my favourite character, and I love Jena Malone's portrayal of her. She has a much bigger role in the novels, but unfortunately I guess for timing purposes they had to cut her section out. Whenever she was on the screen though, Jena Malone stole the show, I just wish we could have seen more from her.

    So overall, I think this was a satisfying end to the series. I'm not going to say it was epic, because as I said before, the whole reason for an ending like this is to show you that sometimes when wars end they aren't completely epic; I'm not going to say it was happy, because it does show you the reality of war and it's kind of bittersweet rather than happy; and I'm not going to say it was amazing/great/whatever because I still think Catching Fire was the best film of the series.

    A few side notes:
  • If you kept an eye out on when I began crying, that would have been a huge spoiler alert because I was crying in quite a random scene
  • I can't be the only one (I wasn't; my brother thought the same) to think that that baby looked Asian?
  • It was so sad seeing the digitised Philip Seymour Hoffman... it was really obvious those scenes were digitised and it just wasn't the same
  • Thursday, 12 November 2015

    Movie Reviews in Five Dotpoints or Less - Part IV

    Forrest Gump (1994)


    8.8/10 on IMDb
    72% on Rotten Tomatoes

  • Man, I always hated Jenny as a kid... and I still do!
  • I absolutely love Tom Hanks
  • Run, Forrest, Run!
  • An awesomely hilarious, yet touching and depressing story
  • Definitely a must see (but you probably already knew that)


    Saving Private Ryan (1998)


    8.6/10 on IMDb
    92% on Rotten Tomatoes

  • That opening sequence is AMAZING
  • And that ending is AMAZING
  • And the middle was AMAZING too
  • And Tom Hanks was AMAZING
  • And Steven Spielberg, you are AMAZING


    Lincoln (2012)


    7.4/10 on IMDb
    90% on Rotten Tomatoes

  • I'll be honest with you, I couldn't finish this movie; I got to about 40 minutes in before I had to leave the living room; I was falling asleep and just couldn't take it any more
  • Don't get me wrong; I see why it was hyped and Daniel Day Lewis does an amazing job as Abraham Lincoln, the legend of a president who abolished slavery
  • However, the script is so heavy; I had subtitles on and it was still such a struggle, so around the time that I left I had no idea what had just happened and what was happening then; I had no idea who was who and it was just all too confusing
  • One of the sickest burns in history though: Thaddeus Stevens: "When will Mr. Wood conclude his interminable gabble? Some of us breathe oxygen, and we find the mephitic fumes of his oratory a lethal challenge to our pulmonary capabilities."


    The Place Beyond the Pines (2012)


    7.3/10 on IMDb
    80% on Rotten Tomatoes

  • Great film with lots of intertwining stories
  • Don't want to ruin it, but Ryan Gosling is a stunt motorcyclist whose life gets shaken up and changed early in the film
  • Bradley Cooper is also in it, and both he and Ryan Gosling do an amazing job
  • The beauty of this film is in the story and the underlying message of it - how peoples' decisions in life can lead to certain consequences and can even affect other peoples' lives - but that people still have choices and everything can be either righted, or turned into a huge mess
  • I definitely recommend it if you're looking for some deep philosophical thinking about the human condition, but be warned it's quite slow and I won't be seeing it again in the near future, but it's still very worthy of a watch
  • Jokes I gotta add another dotpoint: the storyline is great; if you watch the beginning of this movie, then come back 1 hour later, it's almost like it's a different movie, then you come back after another hour and it again seems like it's a different movie, yet it still flows well and has great continuity


    Before I Go to Sleep (2014)


    6.3/10 on IMDb
    35% on Rotten Tomatoes

  • Imagine 50 First Dates meets Memento
  • Not sure why it has received such bad views, but I actually liked it; I thought it was a really interesting story with a good plot twist at the end
  • I guess I understand the criticisms on this film: that it's slow, that it kind of spoon feeds you the information rather than making you think, and that the writing is bad and unrealistic
  • I'm not too sure if I agree on their criticisms (except that yes, of course, Memento did it better); yes, the film was a bit slow and repetitive at the beginning, but I think there is still quite a bit to consider and think about as the film progresses, and while you sort of half know the ending, there's still that other half that you need to figure out (which I couldn't). Yes, the writing could be improved, but I never went in thinking it would be a realistic film; it still makes sense to me
  • So I think it's a bit unfair to rate this movie so badly, and I think it is quite an enjoyable thriller
  • Monday, 2 November 2015

    Two great Toms; Two very different movies

    Bridge of Spies (2015)


    8.1/10 on IMDb
    92% on Rotten Tomatoes

    During the Cold War, insurance lawyer James Donovan (Tom Hanks) is required to defend and facilitate the exchange of a Russian spy to secure the freedom of a young American spy.

    I don't need to tell you that Steven Spielberg is great, but let's face it... it's been some time since he's made a good, watchable film.

    Thank the heavens that this film is actually pretty great.

    It's INSPIRED by a true story, and since it's dealing with such a heavy and serious real-life event, I was quite surprised at just how funny the film was. I mean, I'm not saying it was a constant stream of side-splitting laughter, but Spielberg managed to slip in some really funny moments.

    The intensity of the film was also handled really well. It's not a crazy spy movie like I first thought it would be, as it delves more into the politics and boring negotiations, but the thing is... it's not even boring. Sure, it's a long film and there's quite a bit of talking, but it's easy to follow and the conversations can still be quite interesting.

    I loved Tom Hanks in this. Man, he is a legend. He did a great job in this film.

    Another stand out was Mark Rylance, who played the Russian spy. I love how cute old people are, and this guy was sooooo adorable. Especially the way he would say, "Would it help?"

    Which brings me to another thing that I loved about this film: it really showed how great certain individuals could be.

    In the face of almost guaranteed death, Rudolf doesn't look worried. Why? Well, because... would it help?

    Thrust in the limelight, Donovan becomes the most hated man in America; more hated than Rudolf! Why? Because he's defending a Russian spy. But his character is so idealistic; he goes by the law, he argues for proper procedures to be taken even though it's pretty much a given that this guy is a spy. Why? Because JUSTICE. I love it when people do things on principle.

    So overall, this film is an enjoyable and dramatic biopic which I would recommend seeing at least once. There are some great shots, and the film was quite visually appealing, so while there is not any real necessity to watch it in cinemas, you still won't be disappointed. The themes and nature of this film remind me of Argo, but I do think that Argo is more re-watchable, as Bridge of Spies is a bit too long.


    Legend (2015)


    7.5/10 on IMDb
    62% on Rotten Tomatoes

    Speaking of Toms being legends, Legend looks at the Krays, twin gangsters that terrorised London in the '50s.

    Tom Hardy plays both Reggie and Ronnie Kray, and yet you tend to forget that it's the same actor. Reggie is not entirely cool, calm and collected, but next to the violently paranoid schizophrenic Ronnie, Reggie appears as cool as a cucumber.

    Unfortunately, Tom Hardy is about the only thing that's good in the film. The dialogue is long and very hard to understand with their heavy London accents, and the plot moves at a slow pace, making it hard to get too invested in what's happening.

    Luckily enough, any time Tom Hardy is the focus of the scene, his presence and performance are loud enough for you to be distracted from the bad points of the film. Emily Browning's sheer beauty and mesmerising voice were also enough to distract you from what was going on (even though some of the narration got a bit weird... "Cup of tea? I don't think so.").

    Seriously, Tom Hardy was amazing, especially with Ronnie. Some people might think he went a bit over the top, but I think it just added to the humour. This film definitely was a much lighter film than I thought it would be, and most of that is due to Tom Hardy's exceptional performance.

    But as I said, everything else was just sort of dull, and as great as Tom Hardy was, he couldn't make up for an only alright to sort of bad film. So in the end, Legend is definitely not a legendary film and definitely not worth the watch.

    Saturday, 17 October 2015

    Movie Reviews in Five Dotpoints of Less - Part III

    Fight Club (1999)


    8.9/10 on IMDb
    79% on Rotten Tomatoes

  • It's been 16 years since this film came out, so firstly I don't need to say what the plot is, and secondly I have already long known what the plot twist was and never really could be bothered to watch this film (also because, ages ago, my family watched less than half of this film and my parents got annoyed at it and turned it off)
  • Maybe because I already knew how the movie was going to play out, or what the plot twist was going to be, but I didn't find this film as enjoyable as it has been hyped up to be
  • Of course, the acting is superb (and Brad Pitt is perfection here), the writing and dialogue is amazingly profound, and the twist is great; but I just felt like after the enjoyable first half of the film, it drags out quite a lot and it just feels SO LONG (I was really surprised it wasn't 3 hours long when I finished)
  • But, as I said, maybe this reaction is just because I knew what the twist was already (although, apparently the film itself didn't have a good response when it first came out), and unfortunately I can't erase my memory and rewatch it completely afresh
  • I did enjoy, though, all the hints and subliminal images (I spotted two!) that were planted throughout the film; it was clever


    Cast Away (2000)


    7.7/10 on IMDb
    90% on Rotten Tomatoes

  • A classic that everyone should at least know about
  • Tom Hanks gets stranded on a deserted island and the only way he can get off is to reveal how amazing of an actor he is
  • A must watch
  • One word: WILSONNNNNN!!!


    The Impossible (2012)


    7.6/10 on IMDb
    81% on Rotten Tomatoes

  • In December, 2004, a family of five were vacationing in Thailand when an enormous tsunami struck and separated them; this is the true story of their experiences of the infamous Boxing Day Tsunami
  • While the acting and the script is not the best, the worst is really at the beginning of the film, so if you just deal with the bad beginning, then the rest of the film is a lot better; once the tsunami hits, it's an intense physical, emotional and mental journey as the family struggles through the tsunami, the injuries, and the separation
  • Naomi Watts was actually pretty good in this film; when you see her scream, you can feel her pain; when you see her cry, you can feel her pain; she did a great job
  • There is one scene in the hospital towards the end that was EXTREMELY INTENSE and because of the suspenseful build-up, it was SO FRUSTRATING and I got SO ANNOYED AT IT! WHY DID THEY HAVE TO DO THAT TO MY NERVES, I SERIOUSLY HATED THAT SUSPENSE
  • Anyway, I would highly recommend this film; it's intense, it's scary, it's very very VERY real, and it matches almost perfectly to the true story of the family's survival of the terrible tsunami that we all heard about in 2004; it gives you a better understand of the scale of this event and just how horrible it would have been to go through this


    The Ides of March (2011)


    7.1/10 on IMDb
    85% on Rotten Tomatoes

  • Apparently my Chinese name is a flower that grows in a muddy swamp but still remains beautiful and clean; it's meant to symbolise how I, despite growing in a tainted world, can remain pure and innocent
  • That is essentially the plot of this film, but extended towards politics, where Ryan Gosling is the young and pure campaign manager who does things only when he believes in them and who follows a candidate only when he believe he is the right candidate; but what happens when such a naively innocent person enters the corrupt world of politics?
  • I think this film is very good and I would definitely recommend it; but it doesn't really have that re-watchability characteristic
  • George Clooney's directing is great; it was intense, it was serious, it was entertaining, and it made me interested in politics - something I'm not really into... like, at all
  • Beware, the Ides of March... (And, because I can't help it: Et tu, Brute?)


    A Dangerous Method (2011)


    6.5/10 on IMDb
    77% on Rotten Tomatoes

  • Keira Knightley plays Sabina Spielrein, the mental patient that catalyses the relationship between Carl Jung (Michael Fassbender) and Sigmund Freud (Viggo Mortensen), and thus plays an important role in the development of analytical psychology and psychoanalysis
  • Fassbender, as usual, was great in this, and Mortensen was incredible in this - he completely disappeared into the role and there was no trace of Aragorn left whatsoever
  • The true star of the film, however, was Keira Knightley, whose portrayal of a mental patient with episodes of hysteria was so amazing (some may say it's over the top, but I think she did a good job; although granted I've never witnessed an episode of hysteria before)
  • The film is a great informative story on the development of psychoanalysis and psychology, but I think you need to be interested in or know a little bit about Freud and psychoanalysis to be able to appreciate it
  • Thursday, 8 October 2015

    Things may come to those who wait, but only the things left behind by those who hustle

    So glad to finally catch a break from doing uni work, and even gladder to catch up on some 2014 movies I didn't get to see last year!

    Predestination (2014)


    7.4/10 on IMDb
    84% on Rotten Tomatoes

    I'm not going to say the plot of this, but all I need to say to you to sell you this movie is: time travel.

    I seriously think this is one of THE BEST time travel films out there. The only thing standing in between this film and the #1 spot for the best time travel film I have seen, is Back to the Future. But in terms of serious time travel dramas, this is definitely the best.

    Now I LOVE me some time travel. I've always loved the concept of time travel, and loved reading about all the different theories, paradoxes, and alternate timeline explanations for time travel stories. One of my favourite books is on time travel (The Time Traveler's Wife by Audrey Niffenegger - but for the love of God DON'T watch the film), and while X-Men: Days of Future Past was one of my favourite films last year, I guess you can't really label it a time travel film (it's more a superhero action film than true time travel).

    This film though... it's amazing. It is the epitome of time travel and time travel paradoxes. The entire film is just one amazing adventure leading up to a huge mind blow.

    Ethan Hawke is the main character and he does a great job in this, but Sarah Snook is the one that absolutely steals the spotlight. She is completely AMAZING in this, and I'm really excited to see her future performances.

    The opening is quite interesting, because it introduces you to this world of time traveling, but some may think that the rest of the first act is quite boring. This was the part of the movie where I started to question myself like, "Is this film really about time travel?", and even my mum and brother asked me, "I thought you said this was a time travel film. Where's the time travel?"

    Now, it definitely does take quite a bit of build up, but even though I was questioning where the time travel was, the first act was still very very interesting to me. There is hardly any action and it is more of a recount of events, but Sarah Snook's performance was so amazing that she alone holds your attention. Whilst this section of the film is the longest and has the least amount of time travel, I think story-wise it is the best part of the film because (and without saying too much for fear of spoilers), it really helps to establish the characters, establish the setting and establish the story.

    The second and third act was when the mind blow started to happen, but the very end of the film was extremely weak. I know why they included it, because they needed a plot device to carry the film through, but it was just extremely weak and quite a bit of a cop out.

    Nonetheless, this film is incredibly amazing, with a really really interesting storyline, a really great, pure and classic time travel paradox/theory/situation, and it is a MUST SEE! Everyone NEEDS to see this. It's no longer in cinemas, but it really doesn't matter. See it for the TIME TRAVEL! I guarantee you will enjoy it. Your mind will be blown. Your life will change. You will be a better person.


    Nightcrawler (2014)

    (I know, it's not in English, but I couldn't find another good poster that was in English)

    7.9/10 on IMDb
    95% on Rotten Tomatoes

    No, this film has nothing to do with one of the coolest X-Men characters that ever existed (although how cool would that be!), but don't worry, it's still a good film!

    Jake Gyllenhaal stars as a thief who discovers the art of photography. Specifically, photographing and documenting vicious and gruesome crimes across the town so that he could sell his footage to the news channel with the biggest wallet. Over time, he picks up the skills to succeed in this trade, but as the world of media and sensational news gets more and more demanding, he soon blurs the line between being an observer of crime and being a participant of crime.

    Jake Gyllenhaal here is amazing. He completely transformed himself; he lost A LOT of weight (through his own initiative), he completely changed his body and facial language, he rarely blinked, and he overall just became an extremely creepy shell of the actor we know and love.

    I think this film introduces some really great conundrums that we face in this day and age, and it really makes you think. We are living in the information age; the digital era. At the click of a button, we can get information delivered to us the second it becomes known. With the internet, we are now more than ever connected to what is happening around us. As a result, the media competes for information like vultures competing for a carcass. The media may be cold hearted, but they are just doing what they can to earn money. The media may be feeding us with non-news such as the latest celebrity rumours or the latest fashion trends, but they are just playing to what society wants from them. And when it comes to serious crimes, the media knows how to target certain demographics. White people only tune in to news about white victims? Then who cares about vitims in minority groups! Our target population wants drama, blood, guts and gore? Then who cares about sensitive information! Who cares about informing the police when we can inform the public!

    These are all very real and applicable issues being dealt with in the film. So much so that when the news about the Parramatta shooting occurred, I got a bit worried seeing video footage of the shooting from a nearby rooftop. After watching Nightcrawler, I'm a bit concerned that the person shooting that footage actually knew what was about to happen. And instead of stopping it, maybe they just decided to film it so they could cash it in to the news channel with the biggest offer (in this case, 7 News).

    The film is really scary in this sense, because this stuff could actually happen in real life. Jake Gyllenhaal's performance also does not help in your feeling of unease, because even when he smiles he looks like a freak who could murder you.

    I will say that the film was actually a bit slow, and there are quite a few scenes that drag on a bit, but it is still a good watch and you don't need to see this on the big screen or anything as there's no real need for great quality. But the idea and themes are really good and it is worth a watch for anyone who is interested but not too sure if they should watch it.

    Sunday, 4 October 2015

    Help is Only 140 Million Miles Away

    The Martian (2015)


    8.5/10 on IMDb
    94% on Rotten Tomatoes

    Astronaut Mark Watney is left presumed dead on Mars after a storm forces his crew to leave the uninhabitable Red Planet. The only thing: he's not actually dead.

    It takes four years for another manned mission to Mars to rescue him, so Watney needs to figure out a way to turn a space hub, designed to last the crew 30 days, into a sustainable home, lasting long enough for him to be rescued.

    I was super super excited for this film. The premise is intriguing, the cast is amazing, and the science looked legitimate.

    I was so grateful that this ended up being quite good! At last, Ridley Scott is back to form!

    Seriously, I was quite worried for Ridley Scott.

    "Drew Goddard, who wrote the screenplay for the film, was also at one point set to direct, but left that role to go direct the Sinister Six film. After that, Ridley Scott read the script and jumped into the project, rather than making a Prometheus sequel." -IMDb
    Instead of a Prometheus sequel? Thank God!

    There were some really great visual shots in the film, which really hammered in how lonely it was for Watney to try to live on an unlivable planet.

    Matt Damon as Watney was also amazing. The film had an ensemble cast, but he really pulled the weight of the film. The rest of the cast didn't really need to be there as they didn't do much, but their performances were still great, so I guess you can't really fault it. I guess as well it might be reflective of the theme of the movie (great actors coming together for one film to reflect humanity coming together for one man)? Or that might be a bit of a stretch...

    Watney's character is so great. I think it's really easy to have a full on drama when it comes to stories like these. A man is literally stranded on a planet where nothing grows; he is completely alone in unfamiliar territory. It's so easy to take the depression route and go with someone going completely insane and giving up, but Watney's character is so funny and optimistic even in this terrible situation. It's really refreshing.

    And while doing this is really risky, I think the film had the perfect balance between humour and drama. The film knows how to make us laugh, but it also knows how to keep us on the edge of our seats.

    When I saw the trailer, it looked quite serious, but YouTube commenters were saying that the book was quite funny (with a lot of it being just poop jokes apparently). I expected the film would be sort of funny as well to reflect the novel, but I was still so surprised at just how funny the film was, and how that didn't detract from the seriousness of the film.

    There is some great science in the film as well. According to IMDb, NASA was actually consulted so that they would accurately portray space and space travel in the film. Because of this, the mission to Mars in the film actually reflects the missions that NASA is currently planning for the future, with the spacesuits and technology being based on fact, but only modified to "look cool" on screen. Another surprising thing is that apparently to portray NASA in the film, you need to fulfill certain requirements (such as taking the matter of space travel seriously and how NASA handles space issues), and to do this, the writers had to actually add 50 pages of the script to please NASA.

    Neil Degrasse Tyson was even a part of this promotional video for The Martian back in August:


    How amazing does that look!!!

    So in the end, I think this was a great film about space travel, survival, and the human condition. It was a great watch in the cinemas, with some amazing visual imagery of the Martian terrain, and it had the perfect balance between humour and drama. I think this is a film that everyone would enjoy, from kids to adults, from space nerds to your average Joe. Obviously, understanding a bit more about space would help, but I think they did an okay job at explaining things (even though sometimes I was a bit confused).

    A few side notes:

    -IMDb says: The writer of the novel, Andy Weir, first published his book for free on his own site as a blog for fun. Then people asked him to put it in a downloadable form, then people asked him to put it on Amazon for Kindle download which he did at the then min price of $0.99.
    Man, what a good guy.

    A few side notes that sort of contain ~SPOILERS~:

    And just for funsies:

    Thursday, 24 September 2015

    You Ask How the Watch is Made. Keep Your Eye on the Time.

    Sicario (2015)


    8.0/10 on IMDb
    90% on Rotten Tomatoes

    Emily Blunt stars as an FBI agent who specialises in kidnapping cases but, regardless, is chosen for a government task force on drug cartels. As she gets thrown into the deep end at the border of U.S.A and Mexico, she realises how little her colleagues are telling her, and how dangerously suspicious her mission becomes.

    Right from the start, this film dives straight into the story. The entire film is intense, which isn't much of a surprise since it comes from the same director as that of Prisoners (2013). While some scenes go on for some time, you don't really notice it because the slowness just helps to build up the intensity of everything. Our protagonist works on a hostage case and wants to seek revenge for the atrocities she witnessed, but not everything is as it seems; she doesn't understand what's going on, no one is giving her any information, and she's left to just follow what her teammates are doing. We as the audience also have no idea what is happening, so these scenes really do cause a great deal of suspense even if they're taking their time to unravel.

    Emily Blunt also does an amazing job at being a strong and tough badass of a woman whilst still being emotionally raw and physically vulnerable. While most of the suspense is created through the beautiful shots of scenery and crazy heart-attack-inducing music, Emily Blunt's facial and body language really help to convey that sense of confusion, suspense, and potential horror. No kidding, this woman is slaying it right now; so excited for whatever she's going to be doing in the next few years.

    Seriously, they managed to make a rush-hour traffic scene intense. The cars were not moving but man oh man was it intense.

    I won't say much else, because the rest is just heavy spoilers, but I will say this: Benicio Del Toro was amazing. That dinner scene... amazing.

    I highly recommend this film to be seen in the cinemas, purely for the intensity of the soundtrack, but if you can't be bothered to see it in cinemas, then it's still worth a watch on the TV.


    Everest (2015)


    7.5/10 on IMDb
    73% on Rotten Tomatoes

    Based on the true story of a group of mountaineers trying to reach the summit of Mount Everest, this film explores the greatest Everest disaster ever experienced (prior to filming) back in 1996.

    With an ensemble cast, and a good story premise, and not to mention the most interesting and tallest heap of growing rocks in the world, the film does a pretty darn good job.

    Sure, it's not an amazing film; it doesn't leave you mind blown, and it doesn't really pave the way for future films, but it still does a great job of telling the story of this team of people who want to climb the tallest mountain in the world.

    I mentioned an ensemble cast, but it's really just Jason Clarke who shines through as having something to do. The rest of the stellar cast is pretty wasted away, with people like Jake Gyllenhaal and Keira Knightley not doing much, and Josh Brolin and Sam Worthington only doing a bit more.

    Nonetheless, Jason Clarke still did a fantastic job, and I'm really happy to see him get more and more roles, even if they include Terminator: Genisys... (although I haven't seen it yet, so who am I to judge, really?)

    The film does a great job at really turning you off wanting to go up Everest. It explains to you how dangerous it really is. Once you get to a certain point, you just aren't supposed to live beyond that altitude; your body starts dying... literally. The instructor's job is to not just get you to the summit, it's to get you back down as well, so precautions need to be taken, fitness levels need to be raised, discretion needs to be used; if you aren't walking fast enough, and if you don't make the time window, then sorry, but you can't reach the top of Everest.

    And while this is one of those rare and unfortunate events that so happened to turn into a disaster, you walk out of the cinema not wanting to ever climb a mountain. (Although, I still want to do base camping...)

    It's also great in that it's able to tell the TRUE story. You should know how annoyed I get about accuracy in these true story movies. One critic on Rotten Tomatoes said: "A very conventional disaster film that has none of the standout features of the genre", which I completely disagree with because they're telling the story like it should be; they're telling the true events of the story, and so I don't think it's fair for you to brush off these events and say that they're too "conventional". These events really did happen! People died, people were hurt, people were traumatised. And it's not like it didn't make for a compelling story; it was really intense and done well! So I give massive props to the film for being able to portray a TRUE story and stick to the story well, while also being entertaining.

    So, in the end, I recommend seeing this in the cinemas. It's got some great scenic shots, and seeing it in the cinema really makes you see just how terribly in danger their lives are! You see how high up they are, how small they look when they walk up the mountains, every little detail just makes the film so much more enjoyable, so I think it is worth the watch in cinemas, but I don't think it's worth a bigger screen like V-max or Imax.

    A few side notes:
  • This film didn't make me cry, which is saying a lot seeing as I cry in EVERYTHING; so I guess yeh it kind of lacks in storytelling and bringing that emotional aspect to it; nonetheless it's still engaging enough to hold your attention
  • Tuesday, 15 September 2015

    You think you're done with the past, but the past is not done with you.

    Yay! With Oscar season looming closer we are finally getting into the season of good movies! Unfortunately, the first half of 2015 has not been that great, with very little good original films, but the films coming out from August onwards are (and look like they are going to be) great!

    I'm especially keen for The Martian at the beginning of October, but other films that look super interesting are: Sicario, Everest, Black Mass, Legend, Secret in Their Eyes, Bridge of Spies, The Revenant (next year), The Hateful Eight (next year) and Steve Jobs.

    For laughs, there's also American Ultra (already in theatres) and The Intern.

    Other films that may be good are The Walk, Room (next year), Joy, The Good Dinosaur, and Southpaw (I don't think this is in cinemas still but I will be renting it regardless).

    Then there's the franchise films coming out, like Spectre, Mockingjay Part 2, and of course Star Wars: Episode VII - The Force Awakens.

    So those are the films I'm keen to see coming out these next few months; I've linked the trailers to each one so feel free to watch them! But definitely watch The Martian's trailer; it looks so good! It's got a great cast and I'm hoping it marks Ridley Scott's return to form.

    But anyway, let's get back to one of the films that marks this great season of movies.


    The Gift (2015)


    7.5/10 on IMDb
    93% on Rotten Tomatoes

    A young couple moves into a new home and, upon happenstance, run into a schoolmate of the husband's. At first, things seem friendly, but as this man from the past continually leaves more and more gifts, intrudes more and more into their daily lives, and gives off more and more of a creepy vibe, we start to uncover unsettling details of the two men's past.

    First things first, let's give a big round of applause to Joel Edgerton (pronounced Edge-erton by the way (yes, I checked interviews)). This guy deserves massive props because not only did he write this film, direct it, and star in it... it's the FIRST feature film he has directed. And it is AMAZING. This guy is seriously slaying it.

    Starring alongside him is Jason Bateman, and while he is the main character in this film, I felt like he was overshadowed by Joel Edgerton and Rebecca Hall's performances. Chris Stuckmann said that he thought Jason Bateman completely disappeared into this role, but to me it just seemed like the same old (albeit more serious) Jason Bateman we've seen in other things. His voice is the same, his body language is the same, everything's sorta the same.

    Joel Edgerton, though, did a really great job at being a really creepy guy. Seriously, he gave me the heebie jeebies. Just watching the trailer, you knew he was going to be creepy, but his performance is still great enough to creep you out even more. The directing is also fantastic because it really built up that tension and creepiness. I am TERRIBLE with horror movies, like there is absolutely no way you can get me to watch a supernatural horror movie willingly, so psychological horrors are the most that I can willingly bear (and yes, I watched this film willingly because I thought the creepiness looked great), but this was honestly done so well. There are TWO crazy scenes where the directing builds everything up, and there is so much tension and emotion in it.

    Rebecca Hall was also great in this; she is completely different here from her other performances (The Prestige; Iron Man 3), and she even kept reminding me of Anne Hathaway with her short hair and the way she smiles. Her body language and everything was really great and natural, and also helped in building up that tension.

    So let's get to the plot.

    The plot is pretty creepy. The trailer kind of tells you everything, except WHY. And so I went here thinking it would be something pretty simplistic; like a simple reason that makes sense for everything.

    Instead, I was completely blown away by how the plot of this film gradually unveiled itself, and I was so surprised by how realistic this film is.

    This film is creepy because you are dealing with things that could happen to any single one of us. I don't want to spoil it for those who haven't seen it yet (but all my comments about spoilers are below), so I'll just really briefly say that a lot of the times, we as humans don't really think of the consequences of minor actions we do or minor words we speak. We forget that our actions and our words affect those around us.

    ~SPOILERS~ about the ending


    So the film has a great morale to it, and the plot is executed really well. I recommend seeing it, but it's not necessary to see it in the cinemas. I have thought long and hard about this, and I will even say that I think it is worth a second viewing, just to look over at all the hints that are dropped throughout the film. It's a great film about morality, consequences, and retribution, with an open ending that leaves you to decide and make any conclusion you want out of it.

    Wednesday, 9 September 2015

    Are You Okay?


    In honour of R U OK day (and a friend asking me how to speak to someone who looked like she was having suicidal thoughts), I decided to do a little blog post on some ways you could approach someone who's going through a tough time.

    A good rough guide on how to ask someone if they are okay can be found here, but it doesn't give you much information on what to say and when to say it, so I thought I might give some tips from my own personal experiences of having depression.

    Also, if you don't believe that these three words can actually save a life, just have a read of this!


    Firstly, make sure YOU are okay before you ask someone if they are. If you aren't in the right mental state, then if you ask someone and they unleash a whole can of worms, you might be unable to cope with it, and it might even be detrimental to you, as their can of worms may stack up on your can of worms and bring you down even futher. If this is the case, perhaps speak to someone you are close with, or someone who is close to the person you are concerned about, and they can ask them instead.

    So if you've decided you're okay enough to ask someone about their problems, make sure that you have the time and the effort to deal with their problems, if they do tell you their problems. If someone indeed has a problem, I think it's a fair enough assumption that the problem won't be able to be summarised in just a few sentences, and it might actually take a lot of probing and a long chat to get it all out, so make sure you have the time to listen to all they are saying, instead of rushing off to deal with something else. It is seriously such a bad idea to ask someone how they are going, then have them open up to you, only for you to turn around and say you don't have the time or whatever to help them. It would make them feel even worse than they already are.

    Okay, so you've decided that you're completely able and capable of asking the person if they are okay. How do you do it?

    If it is really obvious, such as a Facebook post, or something serious, you can say something like, "Hey, I know we're not that close but I saw your post/whatever and I was really concerned. Is everything okay?"

    If you have noticed something more subtle about them that has made you want to ask them if they are okay, then don't dive straight into it. Just like any other conversation, start off small by asking them just generally how they are going. Then you can go a bit more specific, but still keep it general, like, "How's uni going?", "How is your family?, "How is work going?", etc. If this doesn't open them up a bit more, then that is when you can start asking more specific things, like, "Are you feeling a bit stressed out? How are you coping with all that?", or "It's just that I noticed you looked a bit upset/stressed/worried, and just wanted to check up on you. Are you sure everything's okay?"

    If they aren't comfortable with talking about it, don't force it upon them, because it could make things worse and they could get quite angry at you for it. Instead, let them know that you are there for them, by saying something like, "Well I hope you're okay, and just remember that if you need anything, I'm always here to talk to. And if you're feeling overwhelmed by everything, just remember that you've got friends and family who you can talk to as well; just make sure you don't bottle up everything inside."

    Another important thing is that you don't always have to suspect something is going wrong in someone's life to ask them how they are going. If you regularly meet up with a friend, it's easy to slip into asking about events or what has happened in the last few weeks rather than how they have been feeling. For example, you might get into the habit of asking, "So what have you been doing these last few weeks?" or "So what are you doing at uni now?", rather than "So how have you been these last few weeks? Everything okay?" or "How's uni going? Do you have any assessments or exams? How are you going with that?"

    This means that even if you didn't know the person was struggling with something, they might be able to come out and open up to you about their issues.

    So what do you do if they actually DO open up to you and tell you all their problems?

    Firstly, it's really important to listen to what they have to say. I know that when I'm upset I usually just want to get it off my chest and tell it to someone... ANYONE actually. Often I'm not looking for a solution, I'm looking for someone to empathise with me. I think back to Parks and Rec where Chris always tries to tell Ann these solutions that he comes up with to her problems, but all she wants is for Chris to sit down with her and say, "Wow, that sucks." Empathising with someone can actually be a lot better than trying to solve their problems for them. It might also be that they've tried to solve their problems and whatever solutions you try and tell them, well, they've already thought of and tried them, and they didn't work. This could make them even more upset.

    Another thing is that if you don't show you can empathise with them, they might not want to talk to you in the future. I know a lot of the times when I open up to someone and then not talk to them again, it's because I have this feeling of, "They just don't GET me." So try and empathise with the person rather than solve their problems; it does wonders.

    If you still think that you have a solution to the problem, you don't have to straight up offer it. You might ask them instead what they think about the problem, or whether they've thought about what to do. After they say all this, then you may be able to give advice on your solutions to the problem, but obviously use your own discretion.

    When it comes to suicide, this is obviously a lot trickier, because often the person might think that the solution IS the suicide. The R U OK article (here it is again for you) has a good summary of things to say when someone tells you they are suicidal. Obviously the most important thing is to try to discourage them from it, but do so really really gently. Tell them that you are really concerned and you care about them and that their lives deserve to continue - all the stuff you can think of, just try not to be too aggressive about it. Recognise that you are not a professional and that there are free professional services out there that they could use - Lifeline, Beyond Blue, Headspace, etc. There are so many avenues for this kind of thing, whether they want to speak to someone in person, over the phone, or on an online chat. Sometimes it's easier telling a stranger all your problems, rather than a friend.

    Another thing is to try to ask them about who they could talk to or call when they have strong suicidal thoughts. You can get them to make a list of all the people they could call, e.g. Lifeline, Mum/Dad, boyfriend/girlfriend, best friend, yourself, 000, etc., which would help them when they're in the moment of wanting to suicide.

    If you are with someone who is in the moment and wants to suicide, make sure you keep their environment free of anything dangerous, such as sharp items, knives, alcohol, drugs, and any medication which they might overdose on. After you do that, you might want to call Lifeline on 13 11 14, or call 000.

    Just remember that whatever the circumstance, be gentle with them and try to listen instead of offer them solutions. Speak to them in a non-judgemental way and let them know that you are there for them and you care about them. And also remember that you aren't the only person who can help; encourage them to speak to others, be it friends, family, or professional services.

    One last thing (and this may be really obvious but it's still worth a mention), if you know of others who have been talking to the person, try not to approach the person. If too many people are speaking to the person it can get a bit overwhelming for them. In those cases, it's probably best to reserve it unless you are really close to them, as you don't want to keep asking them about something when others have asked them and are currently speaking to them about the issue.

    So, that's all I can think of for now, and if I think of anything else I'll update this post. Hope it has helped and remember that if you yourself are struggling with something, speak to someone! I'm free for a chat whenever =]

    Tuesday, 1 September 2015

    Things that I hate

    I'm so annoyed at people who bring something up under the pretence of 'checking up on you' when they actually just want to stir up shit or something. Like when someone is literally the ONLY person to actively bring up the topic with you, and at first it seems like a really nice catch up/check up on you to see how you are doing, and you really appreciate their kindness and everything. And then they just start saying all this random shit that makes you really confused and upset and ends up ruining the rest of your night because even though other stuff is happening and you've got other stuff to do, their words just keep playing in the back of your mind. And I don't even get an honest apology out of them and then I find out that the shit they said isn't even true. Like, thanks for being a 'friend', ruining my night and making me feel a lot more insecure than I was already. Why would anyone do that?

    Don't get me wrong, I love when people are considerate enough to check up on me, but when you are 'checking up on me' with the goal of dropping a bomb of negative information down on me, then I'd much prefer if you never even spoke to me. Because firstly, if the information was true and I knew about it already, it still wouldn't make me feel any better to remind me of the information, and secondly, if I didn't know about the information (false or not), you just casually dropped a bombshell on me while giggling and smiling about it.

    So thanks for being a friend, but if you're going to keep doing that from now on, I'd rather avoid this friendship.

    Wednesday, 26 August 2015

    Movie Reviews in Five Dotpoints of Less - Part II

    Gone Baby Gone (2007)


    7.7/10 on IMDb
    94% on Rotten Tomatoes

  • Ben Affleck's directorial debut starring his very own brother Casey Affleck (yes, apparently Casey is a male name now?)
  • Based off the novel by Dennis Lehane, it tells the story of two private investigators looking into the case of a missing girl
  • Really well written and a great job for Ben Affleck's first directing job
  • Very intense and highly recommended
  • Some crazy plot twists in there


    Rescue Dawn (2006)


    7.4/10 on IMDb
    91% on Rotten Tomatoes

  • Christian Bale portrays an American pilot who gets gunned down during the Vietnam War, taken as prisoner, and becomes the only American to have successfully escaped from a POW camp in the war
  • Christian Bale is so amazingly method! Throughout the course of the film you can see him visibly getting thinner and thinner until his face is just skin on bone, and he even eats worms and a snake for this!
  • The other actors are method too, losing a whole ton of weight to portray malnutritioned and deprived prisoners of war
  • An interesting film but, be warned, it looks like it's filmed on a video camera or something; the quality is not the best and the DVD I rented didn't have a subtitles option so it was really hard to hear what they were saying half the time
  • "Empty what is full. Fill what is empty. Scratch what itches."


    Karate Kid (1984)


    7.2/10 on IMDb
    90% on Rotten Tomatoes

  • Another classic film - do I even need to describe it?
  • Wax on, wax off
  • There's really not much to say - it's a classic film that combines karate, child-labour (under the guise of training), humour, and puberty (but you already knew all that)


    Troy (2004)


    7.2/10 on IMDb
    54% on Rotten Tomatoes

  • Brad Pitt stars as Achilles, the legendary soldier that fights in the Trojan War
  • After studying Greek Mythology in Uni, I think this does a pretty good job of adapting a Greek myth (because, let's face it, they're all extremely bizarre) into a sellable Hollywood action film (and, of course, they did do some changes to the original myth)
  • While the actors were great (and it's always great looking at Orlando Bloom's face), the film was really really long (a bit over 2.5 hours), so enjoyment kind of wanes over time
  • So, it is enjoyable, but not a must-see or anything


    Mr. Holmes (2015)


    7.5/10 on IMDb
    86% on Rotten Tomatoes

  • Sir Ian McKellen: the man, the legend; first, Magneto; then, Gandalf; now, Mr. Holmes
  • Although, it's an aged, retired, Sherlock Holmes, but still Sherlock Holmes nonetheless
  • Unfortunately, Ian McKellen's amazing acting can't save this film
  • An extremely slow-paced movie that does not do any justice to the amazing skills of Sherlock Holmes means this movie is definitely not worth the watch